And you're avoiding the questionYou’re missing the point completely
And you're avoiding the questionYou’re missing the point completely
Have a look on meso and you can see for yourself.What purity do you think raws come back as these days? How long would one of the two raws suppliers in China last if they produced underdosed raws?
And those labs who don’t test their raws and brew a 60% product, what sort of feedbsck do you think they get ?Have a look on meso and you can see for yourself.
You can also see that incorrect and less than 98%+ raws do get sent out to UGLs. I've seen some as low as 60-70% get posted on lab results.
No you haven't, even jano says he can't remember the last time he tested a raw below 96%Have a look on meso and you can see for yourself.
You can also see that incorrect and less than 98%+ raws do get sent out to UGLs. I've seen some as low as 60-70% get posted on lab results.
Have a look on meso and you can see for yourself.
You can also see that incorrect and less than 98%+ raws do get sent out to UGLs. I've seen some as low as 60-70% get posted on lab results.
And those labs who don’t test their raws and brew a 60% product, what sort of feedbsck do you think they get ?
Now now ladies. It’s not that it doesn’t happen, its that it CAN happen. Unknown private retails could easily sell bunk raws and if a lab didn’t test them it could make their gear shoddy.No you haven't, even jano says he can't remember the last time he tested a raw below 96%
Have a look in the pharmacom thread, their Deca iirc.No you haven't, even jano says he can't remember the last time he tested a raw below 96%
Pharmacom don't produce rawsHave a look in the pharmacom thread, their Deca iirc.
You're correct.Pharmacom don't produce raws
They weren't using low purity raws, they underdosed them. You seen their test 600 results?You're correct.
They were using low purity raws to produce their deca batch that came back underdosed.
Also check the QSC thread and you'll see incorrect raws got sent out relatively recently. The UGL luckily tested the raws and caught it.
There's not really much use in arguing this point cus neither of us can prove it either way. And pharmacom never gave a definitive answer afaik.They weren't using low purity raws, they underdosed them. You seen their test 600 results?
Any idea what was in those tabs?It was rife mate, horrid stuff that knocked you sideways.
Was the same from a lot of sources
If it was fentanyl you’d probably be resting in peaces about nowBit off topic but reading about the fentanyl.. I had ordered xanax from a reputable source (gear2go its dead now) around 2 years ago with my usual steroids. The xanax was most certainly something else. Wouldn't go as far as saying it was fentanyl but the bars where pressed totally weak and one pill would knock you out and had me sleep walking twice. Only ever gonna order pharma stuff when it comes to sleeping pills and not from UGL sources.
I've heard adinazolam has been used. Much stronger than alprazolam which it should be.Any idea what was in those tabs?
if its not bitter its not alprazolamMate the VAST majority of these opiate based sedatives are fake and contain all sorts of funky sh1t in various doses.
As you said, it didn’t feel like Xanax….because it wasn’t xanax.
A few reports tend to say 'may' contain...Can't imagine it being Fentanyl considering it only takes micrograms of it to kill you.
Can’t argue with the fact that these look well dosed, and more importantly aren’t faked.A 2nd batch of some pills have had tests published from Pinnacle
View attachment 216763
View attachment 216762
Not exactly a regular occurrence then is it ffs!!You're correct.
They were using low purity raws to produce their deca batch that came back underdosed.
Also check the QSC thread and you'll see incorrect raws got sent out relatively recently. The UGL luckily tested the raws and caught it.