Is there a reason you omitted the details below that table?
Ok so you don’t believe what they tell you about the table of findings and why it’s not a way to assess how effective the vaccine isYes, because it's pure conjecture and speculation and basically clutching at straws to find excuses for why the vaccine is now basically useless (or worse!), at least in terms of preventing infection.
It's time to wake up folks. You've been lied to about basically everything since the beginning of this thing. From the over inflating of the Covid death toll by using the "death within 28 days for any reason following a positive test", a metric never seen or heard of before for any contagious disease, to telling people that locking them in their houses while restricting their access to healthcare and wrecking their businesses and mental health was "saving lives".
To the huge exaggeration of the vaccines efficacy. It's nearly entirely all been lies and misinformation. You've seen in the last week or so how easily Boris and co lie through their teeth regarding their rule breaking etc , well big pharma is probably the single and only more dishonest industry than politics.
And these are the people that have brought you this entire false narrative and agenda.
If you don't believe the government's own data perhaps you'll believe the CEO of Pfizer when he tells you that 2 jabs (fully vaccinated) now offer "limited if any protection" .
Although I fear many of you have been so badly browbeaten by this stage, by what can only be described as phycological warfare and torture that's been unleashed on you by the western MSM and establishment over the past 2 years, that many of you now completely lost your powers of judgement and rationale. So even when you hear the manufacturer of the vaccine themselves actually having to admit the vaccines are currently next to useless at preventing infection, you'll still struggle to accept this fact.
Have a good day all and be safe and stay alert!
Ok so you believe the data they present but don’t believe when they explain why that data isn’t an indicator or the vaccines effectiveness? 🤔Why would they falsify data that goes against their own narrative ?
It’s what those sort of people always do though isn’t it… take a small part of something and use it in the wrong context to suit their anti establishment, conspiracy theory agenda.There is clearly no justification for for quoting what is blatantly misleading raw data to support your view that it does not limit transmission.
The reasons why it does not support your position are clearly stated in the document you referred to.
It does not support the position that the vaccine limits transmission either.
To be clear, my problem is not with your views on how effective vaccines are at limiting transmission.
My problem is that you are quoting unsuitable/misleading data to support that view.
The funny part is you clearly didn’t watch the video you linked did you 😂Conspiracy theory? You've just seen the a Pfizer CEO tell you from his own mouth that 2 shots of the vaccine is no longer any good.
And yet you're still attempting to argue otherwise and I'm the conspiracy theorist.....OK....
Hundreds of billions on what? Over what period? I assume your going to provide supporting evidence for this claim?Strange how the government has money to burn when they want to, but don’t invest in areas and infrastructure that are in dire need, as we are in national debt.
Well now we’ve spunked 100’s of billions we may finally get our belongings repossessed by the bailiffs and a bad credit rating against the countries name.
What of my response makes you think I believe that? I merely asked you to provide supporting evidence for you claim of “hundreds of billions”.
Do you believe money hasn’t been wasted?
We’re not about hurting feelings on here ☺It seems people have already beat me to it.
I have no idea if they have been peer reviewed. I would offer an explanation as to why the peer review process is flawed (if not entirely corrupt), however Mr Denied got very upset when I explained this recently and I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.
For mr average a legion on the heart probably won’t matter a fcuk, but an athlete at the top of their game? It’s the difference between being a pro and playing for Boston FCApparently Aubameyang has had a minor heart scare now and they are trying to say it was due to him recently having Covid.
Him and two of his team mates were shown to have "cardiac lesions".
Athletes are dropping like flies.
I know, I find it both scary and pathetic that someone can misinterpret stuff so wrong but also how they can be so adamant about something they don’t have the slightest understanding of.Neither the data nor the explanation suit his narrative. In his assessment of the data he failed to factor in the small proportion of the population who are classed as unvaccinated (1 jab or none). If he had factored that in he would have realised that unvaccinated people are testing positive at more than twice the rate they should be IF the vaccines were ineffective.
Even the raw data demonstrates vaccine effectiveness before you control for anything else.
im sure those eyes are qualified In virology in order to be able to make an educated decision right?I trust my own eyes. No amount of state /big pharma sponsored scientists trying to explain why black is now white will convince me.
This is how you end up with billions of people living under authoritarian regimes such as in China etc. People blindly follow and "trust" their "leaders" without thinking for themselves, until they reach the point where they're powerless to resist.
You keep letting others think for you though brother if it works for you. Those bi monthly boosters will keep you safe.