I think you've hit the nail on the head. A race war keeps all of the plebs busy and distracted and a fragmented, apathetic population is much easier to control than a united, purposeful one. It also gives governments an excuse to become more and more authoritarian. This is why I feel so strongly about it, because we're headed down a dark path if it carries on and I see a lot of well-meaning people have already been swept up by it.
Walking lunges will have a different effect to when elevating one leg on a bench and definitely be easier on your knees.
Stiff leg deads.
Lying hamstring curls can be done on your bed if you do t have a proper bench. Will need someone to place the db between your feet though.
Get a large camping style back pack and fill with 20kg bags of sand which you can get from any builders merchants. Great for squats.
I did all of the above during the first lockdown
It doesn't matter whether or not the BLM protest you attended happened to be peaceful, or whether you (and others) have decided that they're about tackling inequality, by their own words, actions and self-stated core goals they're a violent, racist, marxist and deeply hypocritical organisation. Founder members have openly called for white genocide, their core tenets are the destruction of Western society. They wilfully ignore the actual problem of absent black fathers and massive black-on-black violence because it doesn't give them any political leverage. They misappropriate donated funds (even buying mansions ffs). The whole thing is a complete shitshow and if you support them then you support all of that. If the KKK rebranded and called themselves "Tackling Inequality" it wouldn't change anything about their actual motives, nor would it excuse you for supporting them.
And just what inequality are they supposed to be tackling? In Britain by far the most disadvantaged group is young, white men. The highest earners in Britain are from Sikh and Hindu backgrounds, followed by those from East Asian backgrounds. Non-white people literally get given special access to jobs, grants and various other benefits that white people can't access simply because of the colour of their skin. Non-white people dominate popular culture and sports, and they're massively over represented in TV and print media. They enjoy the full, overt support of pretty much every corporation and institution who are falling over themselves to appeal to and appease them. They're a legally protected class. Some of the highest political and legal positions in the country are held by non-whites! None of this happens in countries with an inequality problem. If you want to experience systemic inequality, try living in West or South Africa, or in much of Asia. There's absolutely nothing stopping a non-white person in Britain from achieving whatever a white person can achieve. Other than well-meaning white liberals constantly telling them how victimised and oppressed they are and how they can't possibly succeed without handouts and special treatment or how they shouldn't be held to the same moral and legal standards. That is itself racism of low expectations.
Re: the police killing stats, you're ignoring the fact that they're non-whites are even more over represented in crime. If a given demographic is far more likely to be involved in criminal activity, it's also far more likely to be involved in police killings. Even accounting for their higher representation within the population, white people are far more likely to die in trawler fishing accidents. It isn't because trawler fishing is racist or because of some inequality in society.
What are you talking about "time and again"? Seriously, this isn't grounded in reality at all. Police killings are extremely rare. There have been about 30 in the past 20 years! 30! Many of those terrorists. It doesn't make sense to obsess over anything extremely rare and to pretend that it's common when it isn't. It makes even less sense to pick that particular thing to obsess over when there are far bigger, genuine problems in society that people could get (and should be) really angry about. Where's this obsession when it comes to tens of thousands of girls being raped by nationwide, highly organised gangs that even enjoyed the protection of local authorities and police? But of course it takes no guts to put up fashionable straw men like "systemic inequality" and "police brutality". There's no personal risk involved whatsoever. It's just a safe, self-indulgent way to pretend to be a good, brave person whilst not actually doing anything positive or courageous at all.
BLM stands for:
-Abolishing police forces
-Getting rid of the traditional family
Its core founder members are blatant racists, some openly calling for white genocide, one of whom has just been caught buying multiple mansions with donation money.
They're a bunch of bigoted, race-grifting hypocrites who care nothing about black people and are simply driven by a desire to force marxism onto Western society by cynically leveraging any white-on-black killings whilst completely ignoring the massive, systematic problem of black-on-black violence in the US.