Yet again you miss the point. For the THIRD time I will explain that you cannot simply just subtract last year death toll from this years , there are too many variables to consider and not a single statistician in the world give any sort of type to this level of correlation. The 76k deaths are those that have officially died from COVID. The fact of the matter is that in the absence of COVID they would not have died on that day. Sure many might have died anyway in 2020 due to advanced age but that is not a justification to say "ok bugger it they may or may not die, let's do nothing ".
I take your point that the lock down measures are perhaps too draconian, unwarranted or ineffective . That is valid argument, but the a more fundamental point is which again I have to re emphasize what would the figure but if we sat back and did nothing ? We can argue about 76K as being EXTRA of not but this would pale in comparison by doing nothing as we not see due to the ease of restrictions in Christmas period .
People criticise policies but are not familiar with maths behind the science, i.e. the infection period, days infected before showing symptoms culminating in a somewhat crude R0 figure What do you think these guys do at the WHO and CDC? They model and observe real world data based on the spread of covid and other historical pathogens. Half the stuff you read online is complete shite because these authors barely passed a GCSE in maths and their half baked views and analysis on the situation spread about like wildfire instigated by people like Wylde . An uncontrolled spread on COVID puts 1 person infecting 8.5million in 133 days. That is an extreme case of a closed packed community but it was observed in the field (R0 = 2.3 WHO data ). You can know of an excel spreadsheet to verify it if you want
It is PRECISELY the action of WHO and governments that has dramatically reduced this R0 number down to 1.4 and now 1.1 . This is the issue of course with online "facebook experts ". They are uneducated mugs who think its just monkeys working on controlling this and know f'all about this type of modelling . So what do they do. They say "oh remember deases XXX, they said millions could died, yet only 1000s died " A stupid viewpoint as the original statement is predicated on the assumption that in an uncontrolled environment that is the expected outcome. It's a justification for implementation of a policy to nip it in the bud early , and rightly so. Sure they may well be other political and commercial aspects influencing the decision
Of course with any major issue there will be many that don't disagree, that's to be expected and welcomed. It leads to a healthy debate and analysis but unless you have a entire census from EXPERTS in this field it is pointless to infer a ratio of for / against a particular policy whether it be lockdowns vaccines . The people (whether they are experts of not ) who shout the loudest and make youtube videos do not represent the consensus of the RELEVANT medical community . You average GP is not qualified on these matters of global significance.
Its people like Wylde that cause the real damage suggesting people shouldn't vaccinate against any virus. Retarded and irresponsible
I use a whole chicken that's still alive,i blind it first by smearing 50g of butter in each eye so it doesn't know what the f**k is going on then i ram 7 protien bars in its arse (sometimes get an 8th if its got a big arsehole) force it in the blender,no need to use water as it's blood thins it out then drink the deliciousness in one go,traumatize the wife and kids every time I walk in the back door with a chicken flapping about in a carrier bag but f**k em gotta get those gainz