Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

hgh Subcutaneous or Intramuscular

9 posts in this topic

Posted

I have always thought that it didnt matter which way you inject the result was the same.

But after speaking to someone (new to gh himself) @ the gym today he was adiment that sub was for fat loss and intra would create more localised growth, He was told this by his source, can anyone with experience shed light plz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Never had any localised growth from im shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Doesn't HGH and Slin shot IM PWO create a surge in IGF and thus localised growth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

would you say more growth in general than sub

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

not sure but i know he isnt using slin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I have always thought that it didnt matter which way you inject the result was the same.

But after speaking to someone (new to gh himself) @ the gym today he was adiment that sub was for fat loss and intra would create more localised growth, He was told this by his source, can anyone with experience shed light plz

I'm varying my jabs between Subq and IM. Did your mate metion anything abuot the timing for the IM for localized growth ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I have always thought that it didnt matter which way you inject the result was the same.

But after speaking to someone (new to gh himself) @ the gym today he was adiment that sub was for fat loss and intra would create more localised growth, He was told this by his source, can anyone with experience shed light plz

so he would know what he was on about then......

i have used both methods and there is no localised growth (other than swelling) when injecting IM over Sub-Q the only difference is that the uptake of the GH is faster with IM than Sub-Q

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

so he would know what he was on about then......

i have used both methods and there is no localised growth (other than swelling) when injecting IM over Sub-Q the only difference is that the uptake of the GH is faster with IM than Sub-Q

With faster uptake you mean that the gh enters the bloodstream faster IM than sub-q? Personally which has given you the most results and which method do you prefer using?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

With faster uptake you mean that the gh enters the bloodstream faster IM than sub-q? Personally which has given you the most results and which method do you prefer using?

I am not PSCarb but I've followed many of his posts closely and if I may be so bold I believe he and others recommend IM for mass (but not localized) and Subq for fat loss. Of course either way will promote both but specific methods will be slightly more pronounced towards one or the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0