uknumbr14

Joe im with you 100% on this matey, now i compete, previously competed and yet i started gear simply to have big guns, smash into as many women as i could and fkn enjoy myself, i was clueless jst smsshed in sus and deca saw that my arms were growing,bought a short sleeve tight short and i was fkn happy days!! this is why when someone asks the question on the steroids then give the info on the steroids,if they asked for dietry advice blah blah then by all means give that, what idont understand is how th fck can all the peple using gear give morale high ground advice when they are pumping the exact same thing BUT they eat well,train well, how see it if a youngster wants to take it then they will live and learn, they will either pile on a few pounds and never dabble again, or they will then learn and build on it with diet etc, i bet the fkn majority of guys on here didnt start off with the knowledge they have now and i bet the majority just pumped in what their BIG GUY DOWN THE GYM solt them. Experience comes with mistakes and trying things, If you dont try then you cant learn from mistakes, I guarantee many of you guys didnt av ur diet nailed etc b4 injecting i bet it was more to look good on a satrday night,certainly was for me.

Prodiver

The point is that it's totally illogical and unintelligent to say one thing undertaken to give an athlete a physical advantage isn't cheating and another thing is.

If you're trying to match one athlete fairly against another, body for body, all coaching, special diets and extraneous aids should be banned. No special shoes or clothing, only barefoot running, etc. etc...

Our athletics officials and bodies show their lack of intelligence by maintaining the anti AAS position. And anyway, they're actually self-appointed and in fact have no legal status whatsoever.

It'd be perfectly possible for someone to start an athletics association where all possible artificial aids were welcomed and promoted to see what records can be achieved, and the current AA could do and say nothing.

jw007

Drug abuser

People like you give the rest of us a bad name

jw007

I think your attitude is a bit arrogant tbh mate

So what you trained naturally for god knows how many years< so what you read everything going, so what you compete, I was prob like you too when i was younger..

Who really gives a sh1t???? Not me

I couldnt give a fck if your whole life was dedictaed to reading about BB, diet and you even gave up women to try to fullfill your dreams..

Thats just it, They are your aspirations, and YOUR dreams

Some people (me included) dont want to live like that, and training etc is just a past time,, but of course we want to look better to, so why the fck cant we take aas???

If some guy wants to take a bit of gear so he looks good in a tight top in a club, so what??? its hardly going to kill anyone...


You say you reasearch blah blah, But your not the most knowledgeable even on this board, in fact I would say I know far more about gear use than you, so in effect I could tell YOU that your not ready for AAS, and your stil too young....

cellaratt

Tinytom

Ba - you've missed the point.

If someone is not ready for AAS then there is better ways to suggest that to them than saying simply 'you arent ready cretin'

What I am saying is that if you want to put over a good explaination of why then thats fine because thats helpful advice

If you feel the need to ignore it then fine

But simply flaming someone because you think they are stupid etc is not fine.

I dont have to explain what is a polite reply and what is rude, we are all adults and therefore can make an informed choice.

And if that choice is to sit on a marble throne dipensing 'use the search' 'you're not ready' single line answers then thats fine too but that person will most probably get a warning and their post deleted.

Also have a think about how it makes you look personally to write such stuff. Personally I would see it as an insult because you arent helping at all.

I mean what is the point of writing 'you arent ready for gear' without a reasoned description of why.

How would you like it if I said 'people will get banned for flaming' without giving a reason or description of why this is in place.

People are always moaning on this board that the mods dont explain their actions and its the same idiots who write things like 'you arent ready for gear' and so on in the majority.

Hypocrisy?

__________________
Half price bodyshop stuff. PM me for details

Opening Soon Ministry of Fitness Gym

'If you cannot see the road then you make one'

www.performancehypnosis.co.uk - achieve your goals, believe in change

ba baracuss

Fair enough Tom.

That doesn't apply to the way I reply to posts. I think Joe's stance is somewhat different to what you're saying and he's gone off on a tangent.

Mikazagreat

I think it's a good rule to keep the forum helpfull, I'm with tom.

hamsternuts

none of you are ready to use a forum!

Testaholic

i agree, wish they had this on my old forum!

Mikazagreat

But can we have another rule about having to flame trolls

Lousy_Bastard

This is good to see, i have been in a few boards and that's all i see and i'm glad UK Muscle wont stand for this.

Other boards would do well to follow this example.

Con

Strange i have never been banned because it seems like all i do is give smart **** replies....
Is it because i am really ridiculasly good looking????

lumpy

i think this is a good idea i have read alot of info on aas but i still have 101 questions to ask but after seeing people ripped down and made to look like tw#ts i just don't bother.

caterpillar

I wish our MPs were as honest!