![]() |
|
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Newbie Trainer Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
![]() | Good morning G’morning guys, the name’s Paul and just thought I’d introduce myself to you all. I am in the process of applying for the armed forces and as such, getting myself into shape. Cardio-vascular wise, I have always had a pretty good base as I do a lot of running – about 10-13 miles 4 times a week. I’m thinking of mixing that up a bit and adding some strength training exercises on those days. Now, as far as my upper-body strength goes, particularly the arms and shoulders, I’m fairly weak. I’m about 5’10, and weigh in at 64kg (140-150lb I think?) and can manage to throw down about 15 press-ups before exhaustion hits the arms, as well as 1 or 2 full arm extension pull-ups and being able to lift about 35kg from floor to 1.4 metres. I’ve done a fair bit of searching about these forums so that I hopefully don’t bombard you with questions that you probably get everyday, but there are still some things I am confused about. Here goes: - A couple of my friends who are complete gym nuts have told me different things about strength training. One tells me that high repetitions (12-18) of a lower weight will develop endurance, a ‘medium’ amount of repetitions (8-12) of a ‘medium’ weight will develop strength, and low repetitions (4-8) will develop size, but the least gains in terms of strength. My other friend tells me the complete opposite. Which is correct? I have a rough training plan I’m putting together, but I want to focus on improving my overall strength (don’t particularly care about getting big) and not sure if I should be focusing on raw strength, raw endurance – or is it possible to combine the two? Is it disadvantageous to train for endurance but not raw strength, or vice versa? - Requirements for the armed forces are a minimum of 5 full arm extension pull-ups, being able to lift 55kg from floor to 1.4 metres height, and somewhere within the region of 50-60 press-ups in two minutes. Now, I completely understand that there are 1,001 factors in how a person improves, and no two people are ever the same, so this may be a bit of a stupid question. However, I have set myself an overall goal of being able to lift 60kg from floor to 1.4m, do 8 full arm extension pull-ups, and 50 press-ups, in 3 months time – if I can improve further than that in 3 months, then great. Considering my current standard of physical fitness, am I setting myself ridiculously unattainable goals? Again, I understand that different people will improve at different levels – however, I’m wanting to make sure I’m not setting myself a goal that is completely unattainable by human standards, such as saying “I will lose 40kg in 3 days!”. :p I’m a little naïve as to improvement rates. I’m not expecting overnight results, don’t worry! In the past, I have found it hard to build muscle – however I had never fully dedicated myself to a training programme, and my diet was very poor. - Is it advisable to train on the same days as I run? I am thinking about 3-4 times a week strength training before/after running but I’m aware the heart is also a muscle, and don’t want to be working too many muscle groups at once if it’s not a very efficient way of training. Diet shouldn’t be an issue, I’ve looked at a lot of information on this site so far and I’ve taken a lot of info away, so thanks for that. Any help would be much appreciated. Regards, Paul |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Morning..... | PaulLewis | General Conversation | 7 | 12-05-2008 04:06 PM |
| Morning Abs - ??? | pookie69 | Form and Technique | 6 | 09-02-2007 01:19 PM |
| Early morning training | Bulldozer | Getting Started | 6 | 02-01-2007 07:51 PM |
| Morning exercise good for mass? | Mo_ | Getting Started | 9 | 22-10-2006 02:38 AM |