View Poll Results: REP RANGE FOR BUILDING SIZE | |
REPS 6 - 8
|    | 75 | 43.10% | |
REPS 6 - 10
|    | 70 | 40.23% | |
OTHER
|    | 29 | 16.67% |  | |
|
24-06-2005, 07:42 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Forest gym crawley
Posts: 4,119
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by silentbob I'm not sure if I believe its as cut and dry as one particular rep range is best for building size.
There are bodybuilders with tremendous physiques who've always trained with high reps. Just as there are great physiques that have come from doing many sets and also few sets (volume vs HIT).
Personally I think a variety works best. I believe in doing high rep and low rep workouts either in rotation or in training mesocycles. I think a variety of rep ranges is the only way to maximise gains in both fast and slow twitch fibres.
For strength, however, from experience I believe 5x5 works best. |
rep points for you dude :beer1:
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
'Genetics is the science of heredity and variation in living organisms. Inheritance in organisms occurs by means of discrete traits, called genes.'
|
| |
24-06-2005, 07:45 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Forest gym crawley
Posts: 4,119
| i fight injury all the time so i opt for 10-15
i will go as low as 6-8 if the workout is going well but TBH i only feel like i have been training correctly if my reps are high and I squeeze each rep
i even like half reps for that constant contraction feeling
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
'Genetics is the science of heredity and variation in living organisms. Inheritance in organisms occurs by means of discrete traits, called genes.'
|
| |
24-06-2005, 10:02 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | UK-Muscle Male Animal
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,144
| I cycle reps and excercises every two workouts. But like Silentbob said I stick to basic compound movements.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
25-06-2005, 02:33 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Decided to leave quietly.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,999
| I think your all wrong.........:lift:  ;) and there is a perfect rep range |
| |
25-06-2005, 04:39 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | EFBB Winner
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mid Portugal - by the sea
Posts: 3,073
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ONE SMART COOKIE I think your all wrong.........:lift:  ;) and there is a perfect rep range |
:confused: :confused: 
__________________ "I thought I was hard done by, when I had no shoes, until I saw a man who had no feet" "A trainer is only with you an hour a day - the other 23 hours its all down to you." silentbob To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "From little acorns, mighty squirrels do grow" some guy on the Jay Leno show "Don't you think it is a good principle that one shouldn't respect all human opinions, but only some and not others... that one should respect the good ones, but not the bad ones? And good ones are those of people with understanding, whereas bad ones are those of people without it..." Socrates Lets talk Martial Arts and More To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. forum Mod at To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
My site To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
:rolleye11 |
| |
25-06-2005, 05:01 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | UK-Muscle Male Animal
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,144
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ONE SMART COOKIE I think your all wrong.........:lift:  ;) and there is a perfect rep range | Oh do tell Zen Master. :spammer:
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
25-06-2005, 05:26 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Somewhere between depressed and suicidal
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: location, location
Posts: 1,080
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ONE SMART COOKIE I think your all wrong.........:lift:  ;) and there is a perfect rep range | hints to us he has the answer to life and then pi$$es off! |
| |
25-06-2005, 05:44 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | UK-Muscle Male Animal
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,144
| Yea cookie, you are just a big tease. 
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
25-06-2005, 06:39 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Decided to leave quietly.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,999
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by winger Oh do tell Zen Master. :spammer: | Thats right winger baby zen master is happening..but we`ll chat about that later on msn;) Quote: |
hints to us he has the answer to life and then pi$es off!
| Ckeeky young pup...little more respect to your elders and betters or I wont tell you naff all...I`ll just take my bat and ball home.. Quote:
Yea cookie, you are just a big tease. | More than you know..............
Here you all go..happy reading..theres a lot of it..lmao..... http://t-nation.com/readTopic.do;jse...51322&pageNo=0
Last edited by ONE SMART COOKIE; 26-01-2008 at 04:55 PM.
|
| |
26-06-2005, 02:35 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | UK-Muscle Male Animal
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,144
| Bump for later read, but I skimmed it and I am not impressed. I did 20 reps and tried that for a while and all I did was loose strength and if anything I lost size. All of us are different and I still stand by hiit training. The more you lift the bigger you get. I have yet to see a small 500 lb bencher. Can anyone point one out for me please? 
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
26-06-2005, 07:17 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
| | Decided to leave quietly.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,999
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by winger Bump for later read, but I skimmed it and I am not impressed. I did 20 reps and tried that for a while and all I did was loose strength and if anything I lost size. All of us are different and I still stand by hiit training. The more you lift the bigger you get. I have yet to see a small 500 lb bencher. Can anyone point one out for me please?  | I think you need to read it "PROPERLY" as you`ve just made assumtions about it and got it "TOTALLY" wrong............... |
| |
26-06-2005, 09:49 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
| | EFBB Winner
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mid Portugal - by the sea
Posts: 3,073
| so hence 5x5 = 25, or 8 sets of 3 = 24, Right??, is that also totals per Body Part or Per exercise
It was only a skim through, in answer to wingers point, but is that along the right lines???
__________________ "I thought I was hard done by, when I had no shoes, until I saw a man who had no feet" "A trainer is only with you an hour a day - the other 23 hours its all down to you." silentbob To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "From little acorns, mighty squirrels do grow" some guy on the Jay Leno show "Don't you think it is a good principle that one shouldn't respect all human opinions, but only some and not others... that one should respect the good ones, but not the bad ones? And good ones are those of people with understanding, whereas bad ones are those of people without it..." Socrates Lets talk Martial Arts and More To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. forum Mod at To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
My site To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
:rolleye11 |
| |
26-06-2005, 09:57 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: I like beer, sex and steroids, in that order
Posts: 5,041
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by samurai69 so hence 5x5 = 25, or 8 sets of 3 = 24, Right??, is that also totals per Body Part or Per exercise
It was only a skim through, in answer to wingers point, but is that along the right lines??? | Yes.
I've read that one before, along with most other articles Chad puts out. I like Chad's writings. He advocates that much volume but NOT to failure. In fact, if you're doing 8 sets of 3 with only 80% of your 1RM, you're a long, long way from failure. I tend to lean the other way for most beginner/intermediate trainees and encourage far less volume, but with more of an emphasis on how to work progressive resistance, as this is the key IMO. The only things really missing from the article is deloading phases (which ARE needed when doing that amount of volume) and progressive resistance.
The idea behind a volume routine like that, is that you'd load up and bring yourself to the point of overtraining (even overtrain slightly), and when you deload is when your strength would actually increase - with the rebound effect from overtraining (i.e. what bodybuilders traditionally see when they take a week off, and then typically mistake that week off for lesser frequency being the answer).
I wholeheartedly disagree with his statement that anything under this magical "24" number will fail to give hypertrophy though. Most of the guys doing WSB, are only doing 1-3 work sets with 1-3 reps. And they sure seem to get plenty of hypertrophy. Not to mention all the guys getting big off low volume routines. There are lots of ways to get big/strong.
But yeah, nice article.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |
26-06-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
| | Decided to leave quietly.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,999
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by big Yes.
I've read that one before, along with most other articles Chad puts out. I like Chad's writings. He advocates that much volume but NOT to failure. In fact, if you're doing 8 sets of 3 with only 80% of your 1RM, you're a long, long way from failure. I tend to lean the other way for most beginner/intermediate trainees and encourage far less volume, but with more of an emphasis on how to work progressive resistance, as this is the key IMO. The only things really missing from the article is deloading phases (which ARE needed when doing that amount of volume) and progressive resistance.
The idea behind a volume routine like that, is that you'd load up and bring yourself to the point of overtraining (even overtrain slightly), and when you deload is when your strength would actually increase - with the rebound effect from overtraining (i.e. what bodybuilders traditionally see when they take a week off, and then typically mistake that week off for lesser frequency being the answer).
I wholeheartedly disagree with his statement that anything under this magical "24" number will fail to give hypertrophy though. Most of the guys doing WSB, are only doing 1-3 work sets with 1-3 reps. And they sure seem to get plenty of hypertrophy. Not to mention all the guys getting big off low volume routines. There are lots of ways to get big/strong.
But yeah, nice article. | You have to also take into account that he is probably marketing this at natural trainers and most if not all the guys that I have seen/read about on WSB are gear users...
As for the volume thing you can turn it around and drop the sets down to the region of 2 or even 3 but up the reps slightly to make the numbers up.
IMHO I think only training to the 80% mark on any given set is the most productive way to go for a vast majority of people..not only will this encourage continual growth but also keep enthusiasm high as i do feel so many people come to a point after pounding out the intensity for awhile hit plateaus too quickly then more than often see this as an indication that they need to increase drug use(the old adage).
As for the detraining this should be in everybodies training..personnely I dont like to train for more than 21-28 days without a 5-7 days rest then start again..
You can still have progressive resistance with his ideas as all you have to do is stick to the same reps/set scheme note all weights lifted and recovery etc from it and increase weights slightly each week..
I also dont think you should use his idea to load up on volume and overtrain I think it should be used to stop you from over training in that is you do keep the reps low but the sets high and dont reach your targets sets then the following workout all you do is jiggle the numbers drop the sets right down but up the reps to keep within the guidelines just as chef would say "resetting"when you fail to meet rtequired numbers that way you should never overtrain... |
| |
26-06-2005, 04:22 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Sunny Southern California U.S.A.
Posts: 21,627
| Interesting last two posts.
I think all rep ranges are usefull.
The other day, I didnt feel like having alot of intensity for legs so I did 10 sets of 10 with fairly light weight on one exercise with low rest and called it a day.
I was sore the next day too.
__________________
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." - George Carlin Scott To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| |  | | |