UK-Muscle Body Building Community - Bodybuilding Forum  

Go Back   UK-Muscle Body Building Community - Bodybuilding Forum > Training Information > Advanced Bodybuilding

Notices

View Poll Results: What is the number one back (Width) builder
Deadlifts 16 8.99%
Wide grip chins 103 57.87%
Pulldowns 27 15.17%
Bent over rows 32 17.98%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools
Old 17-06-2007, 12:03 AM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #31 (permalink)
Goal - To be a M&F Model
 
The Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 248
The Rave is on a distinguished road
Re: Back width

I agree that wide grip pull downs or chin-ups builds width to the top of the back by increasing the size of the lats, but lets not forget that the lower lats also give width to the lower back!
The Rave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2007, 11:13 AM   #32 (permalink)
Shouldn't be let out loose....
 
Nine Pack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,632
Nine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by ONE SMART COOKIE View Post
The main fundamental failure I have found with people not gaining is more often than not, not the exercises they are performing, Be it the same ones over and over again BUT the WAY they train, ie, to failure etc etc etc over prolonged periods of time & with a mental block on their ability to be able to perform the same routines over extended periods of time.

If an individual was to follow the principle of *greasing the groove* they would find that they get stronger and more proficient at the exercise which will lead to improved nureopathway activity & muscualr growth when the repetition range is increased....Grease the groove usually follows a principle of low repetitions mutliple times per day (if possible) on a daily basis (if possible)..Now if your following that type of pattern (GTG) and started adding extra resistance into the mix you are not only going to get stronger but bigger.

Even when switching on a continual basis the body can *cotton on* to what you are doing and this won`t always work for some people.
This technique really has no place in the training schedules of anyone training to increase muscle size, which is the case for most of the people on this board. It can allow you to increase endurance & strength but will yield little muscular gain in itself. It may be of use to push past a strength plateau & then return to normal methods though.

I am aware of the principles of synaptic facilitation, and Pavel Tsatsouline's methods, but I can't think of a single successful Bber that he has coached. I think this is where we are at cross purposes OSC. My methods are geared purely to the aesthetic of muscular growth, whilst you are talking about strength & endurance. As a Bber, I freely admit that my methods are not necessarily the best approach from a functional point of view (as I am reminded of when trying to dress myself in the morning!), but they do yield better visual gains and that's what 99% of guys in the gym are concerned with. When I stop competing, I will utilise a myriad of different methods & take a more 'all round' approach to my training, but for now and the forseeable future, I'll stick to what I know, and can show works.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


''I reject your reality and substitute my own''
Adam Savage.
Nine Pack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2007, 12:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
Gaining muscle
 
deejpj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
deejpj has a spectacular aura aboutdeejpj has a spectacular aura about
Re: Back width

id go for wide grip chins
__________________
All I have in this world is my balls, and my word, and I don't break 'em for no one, jou understand?" Tony Montana - Scarface

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

deejpj is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2007, 12:10 PM   #34 (permalink)
Decided to leave due to idiots & and their over inflated egos
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,015
ONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with HackskiiONE SMART COOKIE Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Pack View Post
This technique really has no place in the training schedules of anyone training to increase muscle size, which is the case for most of the people on this board. It can allow you to increase endurance & strength but will yield little muscular gain in itself. It may be of use to push past a strength plateau & then return to normal methods though.

I am aware of the principles of synaptic facilitation, and Pavel Tsatsouline's methods, but I can't think of a single successful Bber that he has coached. I think this is where we are at cross purposes OSC. My methods are geared purely to the aesthetic of muscular growth, whilst you are talking about strength & endurance. As a Bber, I freely admit that my methods are not necessarily the best approach from a functional point of view (as I am reminded of when trying to dress myself in the morning!), but they do yield better visual gains and that's what 99% of guys in the gym are concerned with. When I stop competing, I will utilise a myriad of different methods & take a more 'all round' approach to my training, but for now and the forseeable future, I'll stick to what I know, and can show works.
I think it has a place in bbing training..

As I pointed out in my first explanation that if extra weight were to be added to this type of regime then increased muscular size would be a byproduct of following it aswell as increases in strength and endurance.

Now if another method (ladders) of increased volume whilst without the need to go into training to failure mode was used then that would also give the individual increases in muscular size whilst still using the same exercise.

Increases in muscular size whilst using the same exercises over & over again can easily be achieved by the use of simple techiques posted above as examples (and there are many more) but also by a simple tweak of reps, sets, rest periods. It is usually the lack of proper planning that mean people fail to make continual gains...

ALL techniques have a place in ALL sports...

And I`m speaking as an ex competing bodybuilder...

And to be a bodybuilder DOESNOT mean that you have to be unfucntional, maybe you should do a bit of research on the likes of Grimek et al and they way they were not only huge guys but also very very functional & athletic..
ONE SMART COOKIE is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2007, 07:13 PM   #35 (permalink)
Shouldn't be let out loose....
 
Nine Pack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,632
Nine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with HackskiiNine Pack Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by ONE SMART COOKIE View Post
I think it has a place in bbing training..

As I pointed out in my first explanation that if extra weight were to be added to this type of regime then increased muscular size would be a byproduct of following it aswell as increases in strength and endurance.

Now if another method (ladders) of increased volume whilst without the need to go into training to failure mode was used then that would also give the individual increases in muscular size whilst still using the same exercise.
I'm not going to change my views on the training to failure issue as I firmly believe it's the signal that triggers maximum growth if done correctly.

Increases in muscular size whilst using the same exercises over & over again can easily be achieved by the use of simple techiques posted above as examples (and there are many more) but also by a simple tweak of reps, sets, rest periods. It is usually the lack of proper planning that mean people fail to make continual gains...
I have said on several occasions that variations don't always have to be different exercises & that changing variables as you describe is another stimulus for growth. I believe that a change of exercise is however a greater stimulus than merely a change in reps etc. Of course, you eventually have to return to a particular exercise as there is only so many variations you can explore. I believe a mixture of varying exercises AND rep/set/rest variables is the key.

ALL techniques have a place in ALL sports...
I personally don't agree with this to the letter, especially in something so specific as BBing, but there are some crossover areas.

And I`m speaking as an ex competing bodybuilder...

And to be a bodybuilder DOESNOT mean that you have to be unfucntional, maybe you should do a bit of research on the likes of Grimek et al and they way they were not only huge guys but also very very functional & athletic..
I agree they don't have to be, but in reality, most BBers have some flexibility & ROM issues due to the sheer size of the muscles. There are the exceptions, like Ronnie & Ernie Taylor who can perform splits etc, but on the whole this is not the case.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


''I reject your reality and substitute my own''
Adam Savage.
Nine Pack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2007, 11:20 PM   #36 (permalink)
Goal - To be a M&F Model
 
The Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 248
The Rave is on a distinguished road
Cool Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Pack View Post
This technique really has no place in the training schedules of anyone training to increase muscle size, which is the case for most of the people on this board. It can allow you to increase endurance & strength but will yield little muscular gain in itself. It may be of use to push past a strength plateau & then return to normal methods though.

I am aware of the principles of synaptic facilitation, and Pavel Tsatsouline's methods, but I can't think of a single successful Bber that he has coached. I think this is where we are at cross purposes OSC. My methods are geared purely to the aesthetic of muscular growth, whilst you are talking about strength & endurance. As a Bber, I freely admit that my methods are not necessarily the best approach from a functional point of view (as I am reminded of when trying to dress myself in the morning!), but they do yield better visual gains and that's what 99% of guys in the gym are concerned with. When I stop competing, I will utilise a myriad of different methods & take a more 'all round' approach to my training, but for now and the forseeable future, I'll stick to what I know, and can show works.
I personally think that training to failure works and it works for me! I train at least one set for each muscle (on that day) I train it and am growing in mass and strength faster than when I did not go to failure. I would recommend that you download "Bodybuilding - Mike Mentzer's Hit" from a torrent file as he trains to failure alot for growth!

When you look at it simplistically it makes sense; muscles grow back stronger to cope with additional load, 'The Overload Principal'. The more you overload the muscles, the stronger they must get to cope with the additional loads!
The Rave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2007, 07:36 PM   #37 (permalink)
Learning and Improving.
 
Liam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Newcastle / Hull
Posts: 1,184
Liam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant futureLiam has a brilliant future
Re: Back width

I'm starting to get the feeling doing bent over rowing is only working my arms as i don't feel like my lats are even getting harder during the exercise.
What else other than chins can i do(can't do chins yet).

I remember i think i used to do an exercise with one knee on the bench then u pull the weight up to your chest, does that work the lats? lol
Liam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2007, 09:12 AM   #38 (permalink)
UK-M's Pet Monkey
 
Ecksarmy11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 412
Ecksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud ofEcksarmy11 has much to be proud of
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinytom View Post
I like cable pullovers/pulldowns.

Its the ONLY exercise that isolates the lats you know. :rolleye11
Can someone explain cable pullovers/pulldowns or post a link ?
Cheers.
Ecksarmy11 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2007, 10:39 PM   #39 (permalink)
Looking Freaky
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Herts
Posts: 896
SCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant futureSCJP has a brilliant future
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecksarmy11 View Post
Can someone explain cable pullovers/pulldowns or post a link ?
Cheers.
http://exrx.net/WeightExercises/Lati...BPullover.html

I think you know what pulldowns are!

For Liam:

http://exrx.net/Lists/ExList/BackWt.html#anchor125439

I think any exercise that involves drawing your elbow towards your torso will work your lats.
SCJP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-08-2007, 10:13 AM   #40 (permalink)
Newbie Trainer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
alex.p is on a distinguished road
Re: Back width

Wide grip pullups behind the neck worked best for me
alex.p is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2007, 09:22 PM   #41 (permalink)
Gym Addict
 
hertderg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Of The Tyne
Posts: 280
hertderg will become famous soon enough
Re: Back width

what's better - lat pulldown to front or rear ?
hertderg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2007, 02:14 AM   #42 (permalink)
all up in me bird's gutty-wuts
 
andr0lic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jersey - the New one
Posts: 145
andr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to all
Re: Back width

for your rotator-cuff - front,

for your muscles - neither. both hit the entire back complex in different and IMO equally effective manners.


Best back width for me was always close grips because I felt it more in my batwings and less in my rear delts delts create width, but I always thought wide low hanging lats constituted a wide complete back.
__________________
Gather ye rosebuds while ye may,
Old time is still a-flying;
And this sweet flower that blooms today,
Tomorrow will soon be dying
andr0lic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2007, 07:54 PM   #43 (permalink)
Gym Addict
 
hertderg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Of The Tyne
Posts: 280
hertderg will become famous soon enough
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by andr0lic View Post
for your rotator-cuff - front,

for your muscles - neither. both hit the entire back complex in different and IMO equally effective manners.


Best back width for me was always close grips because I felt it more in my batwings and less in my rear delts delts create width, but I always thought wide low hanging lats constituted a wide complete back.
Cheers m8 - I'll stick to front for now.
hertderg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 01:43 AM   #44 (permalink)
Newbie Trainer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 17
BigDS is on a distinguished road
Re: Back width

Quote:
Originally Posted by hertderg View Post
Cheers m8 - I'll stick to front for now.
i do 2 sets to front and 2 sets to back, both to failure and after deads but before bent over rows.

has worked really well fo me and i like the idea of mixing it up.

side note - really good discussion in this thread. loving the science in ti.
BigDS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 02:07 AM   #45 (permalink)
all up in me bird's gutty-wuts
 
andr0lic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jersey - the New one
Posts: 145
andr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to allandr0lic is a name known to all
Re: Back width

I like your volume D as if one needs more than two focused intense working sets of either, you're not properly stimulating the muscles, and are just doing counterproductive work that will in most cases hinder recover and impede mass accumulation

Id agree to mix them up also, as IMHO there is no exercise done behind the neck that cannot be used productively and safely as long as certain tenets are adhered to.


1. Do NOT go too heavy. I don't care if your name's Branch Warren. You are inviting injury as you won't be able to properly stabilize.

2. Do NOT go all the way down right to the back of the neck. Ear level works fine for more than most.

3. Do NOT lean forward. Of course a slight lean may be warranted, but focus on slightly craning your neck down to allow for proper range-of-motion.

4. Do NOT use a fast rep cadence(speed) as this is where most injuries are prone to manifest. You can explode it up(on presses), if it helps you get in the groove, but control it on the eccentric portion and pause briefly at the turnaround. BTN pulldowns are a trickier and more delicate movement though, because the positive portion of the rep drives the weight right into the danger zone, and those who get overzealous often pay a certain price. So full attention should be given to every inch of the repitition, especially near the bottom as thats where the fatal tweak is most often going to happen.

5. Do NOT make any behind-the-neck movements a staple in your routine or if one is working extremely well for you, allow yourself a period of time to reap the most you can from the movement, but then cycle off any behind the neck work for at least as long as you were hitting it before you resume. It will cause you problems if you constantly push it over the long-term.

-Andy
__________________
Gather ye rosebuds while ye may,
Old time is still a-flying;
And this sweet flower that blooms today,
Tomorrow will soon be dying

Last edited by andr0lic; 31-08-2007 at 02:42 AM.
andr0lic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.uk-muscle.co.uk/advanced-bodybuilding/19996-back-width.html
Posted By For Type Date
Rear Lat Spread - Bodybuilding.com Forums This thread Refback 16-08-2007 07:16 PM
UK-Muscle Body Building Community - Bodybuilding Forum This thread Refback 16-06-2007 01:49 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LOOKING AFTER YOU SHOULDERS #1 cyclops_45 Advanced Bodybuilding 2 07-07-2007 11:08 AM
Lifting Techniques rugby_mike Form and Technique 10 04-04-2006 05:10 PM
how to dead lift colrob1 Strength and Power 1 07-07-2005 10:31 PM
How far back on Deads? Timmy Smooth Form and Technique 10 13-03-2005 11:57 AM
Beyond Failure... damagedgoods Advanced Bodybuilding 6 13-08-2004 10:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.
 


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
All information contained within this site is for educational purposes only.
We do not endorse the Buying or selling of illegal substances nor do we promote the use of them.

UK-Muscle.co.uk takes no responsibility for any advertisers, thier content or products sold. All products sold by ANY advertisers are seen to be 'Research Items' only and not intended for Human Use.