![]() |
|
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| UK-Muscle Moderator and NABBA Champion Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,518
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Bioizer duo-thate 250 using it at the moment...
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Admin at To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Sponsored by Extreme Nutrition - Almost an unfair advantage |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Sex Pest | Re: Bioizer duo-thate 250 You cant beat the old test tren mix but the company behind this product would have been better of using Test-cypionate and tren-enanthate blend. When producing blended products the most important factor in a low pain high concentration well balanced injectable is not the overall hormone concentration in mg/ml but the ester concentration. Enantahte is a 7 chain ester and cypionate an 8 chain ester so the release speeds is not an issue hear, I have used this product and I have also used a test-cyp 200mg/ml tren-e 100mg/ml blend and found the bite with the duo-thate to be somewhat greater as was the post injection site soreness. There is somewhat an art in making high concentration blends, also it is advisable to match the solvents/carrier dispersion rate with the hormone dispersion rate. IMHO each product should have its own specific % of solvents and carriers. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sustanon 250 Organon | Gunna | AAS Picture Board | 17 | 23-05-2008 09:16 AM |
| Bioizer advice?? | dale_flex | Steroid and Testosterone information | 14 | 01-04-2007 07:20 PM |
| Sustanon 250 | Jock | Steroids & Associated Drugs Articles | 0 | 03-02-2004 03:00 PM |