View Single Post
Old 13-05-2008, 10:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
pauly7582
Getting HUGE!
 
pauly7582's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,183
pauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskiipauly7582 Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: AAS Dosage and Bodyweight

Quote:
Originally Posted by wogihao View Post
It makes sence for it to be related to weight, in medicine they calculate the dose that way (for drol anyway).

That's for safety/health reasons mate.

I do agree with you though. I didn't really make myself clear in my first answer.

Consider what happens when muscles hypertrophy. Tesosterone and androgens bind to androgen receptors (these are nuclear receptors found in the nucleus of muscle fibres) causing nucleus proliferation. The new nuclei stimulation of satellite cells to bring new contractile apparatus making the muscle bigger. So, considering a bigger muscle has more nuclei and therefore more receptors for test then more gear can be used in bigger muscles.

I'm of the opinion however, that something like a gram of gear will still easily saturate these receptors in even the most hypertrophied of muscles (and remember the number will down regulate with prolonged gear use)

So what I was arguing against was the use of mega doses like 2g a week and the use of body weight as an excuse for this.

But yes I agree that AAS dose, or rather the amount of a dose that can be used by the body, is dependent on body weight.

__________________
6' 0"
218lb
9% bf
BP: 160k
DL: 240k
Squat:200k

Dieting
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pauly7582 is offline   Reply With Quote