View Single Post
Old 06-05-2008, 09:15 PM   #29 (permalink)
big
UK-Muscle Moderator
 
big's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The only side effect of steroids is GREATNESS
Posts: 5,524
big Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond words
big Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond wordsbig Has greatness beyond words
Re: Reputation Comments - Names?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaManiac View Post
Which sh1tbag has voted no?
I voted no. Want to call me a sh1tbag again now that you know, or would you like to listen to the explanation first?

I voted "no" primarily because the rep system is supposed to be light-hearted fun, not a way of ganging up on people because they dislike your posts and neg repped you.

Either leave it anonymous or remove it altogether IMO.

Nobody with a reasonable amount of weight when it comes to handing out reputation neg reps people for fun - so the only time you're likely to get anon neg rep is from someone who's rep doesn't count anyway. It's a total non-issue.

The idea of the rep system is to say "yeah nice post", or "that was immensely unhelpful". Not a way of saying "oooh look at me, I've just repped you, why don't you rep me back".

I often positive rep, sometimes leave my name, sometimes don't. When I neg rep (and it's rare - normally to people who make repeated time-wasting posts), I sign my name.

No doubt this vote will be a landslide in favour of "yes" though
big is offline