View Single Post
Old 19-04-2008, 04:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Jock
LEAGUE LEGEND!
 
Jock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 3,070
Jock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with HackskiiJock Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: Need a good heart rate monitor

Quote:
Originally Posted by saint72 View Post
Ok I got the Polar fs3 seems pretty good so thanks for the advice there Jock. I have managed to find 2 different formulas on heart rates but I am a bit confused which is the one I should be using.

Formula 1
220-35 x 0.65 = 120 bpm 65%
220-35 x 0.70 = 129 bpm 70%

Formula 2

Using this other formula I found you can see there is quite a difference.

(max - resting) x 0.65 + resting = 65%
(max - resting) x 0.70 + resting = 70%

for example we'll use my heart rates
my resting is 66 beats per minute
my max is 185 beats per minute
so
(185 - 66) x 0.65 + 66 = 143 bpm 65%
(185 - 66) x 0.70 + 66 = 149 bpm 70%


As you can see 2 very different results? be very greatful for any advice :crazy:
Mate formulas like that are only a very rough guide and take no account of so many different factors.

If Fat-burning is your goal then stick with the first formula.

I have low intensity stuff and it's not for me, I don't get the results and the carry-over to the heart and lungs for an athelte is negliable.

I usually do my low-intensity training at between 150-160pm, I have 5g of Glutamine before hand and thats it.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Jock is online now   Reply With Quote