| Re: GH study carried out on athletes
no study on vital organs but then there is no evidence to show it does or does not have an impact any opinions on this either way is just guess work...
Now i obvouisly cannot say for this article but i would think that they would not claim new muscle gained if it was just Hypertrophy when you look at the basics with GH as it converts to IGF-1 in the liver then i would say it was Hyperplasia.
this would go with my results as i have gained 20lbs of lean muscle between 2006 and 2008 this is also the length of time i have been using GH now i am not saying it is all down to GH as that would be stupid but for me to gain this amount after 19yrs on steroids you can logically assume it is mostly down to GH
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Admin at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sponsored by Extreme Nutrition - Almost an unfair advantage |