Thread: Flax, fish oils, or Udo's
View Single Post
Old 23-08-2007, 09:55 PM   #43 (permalink)
thestudbeast
bann3d
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Weston super mud
Posts: 1,525
thestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskiithestudbeast Is on a par with Hackskii
Re: Flax, fish oils, or Udo's
Quote:
X-Faxtor comes to mind here.
Said to be anabolic due to its AA content
I looked into this after reading many, many good logs on x-factor and decided against when looking into AA. The makers of x-factor suggest you don't take any omega 3 on it as it suppreses the inflamitory effect of AA. The call it the component of red meat that makes you grow but it seems to be more present in liver. I also saw AA linked to cancer? Well that was the end of my research into this product.

So Tony can I ask why you think AA is not a good idea supplemented? Is it for the reasons above or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
thestudbeast is offline   Reply With Quote