View Single Post
Old 17-08-2007, 09:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
toxictoffee
marmite
 
toxictoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 769
toxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud oftoxictoffee has much to be proud of
Re: FAO ToxicToffie on protein intake.

hi tom

yes

for someone like yourself who is an an AAS user i believe the level may increase slightly die to the nature of gear and your additional LBM, thus increasing the requirements to ensure a positive nitrogen balance


Quote:
many saturated fat and processed carb calories most of which are useless to the body in terms of muscle building.
careful now :lift:

lots of benefits of these babies in the diet, just the type of them but as staple items i have to agree although whole eggs and red meat should of course be advocated and dextrose PWO...apart from that, yep i agree

i think some forget the notion of CHO requirements of the brain and CNS, which is ~120g ED for most

so 'bulk' off 250g of carbs and really you are not ultimately providing enough carbs for anabolism and on the flip side, consume too many and you do create anabolism but the anabolism of fat

IMO its about creating the right insulin response at the right time but thats a whole different debate (which would be nice some day)

i believe if people backed off a touch on protein and upped quality cals they would be better off but thats the nature of the UK, the US seem a little more 'clued' up on it
toxictoffee is offline   Reply With Quote