UK-Muscle Body Building Community - Bodybuilding Forum - View Single Post

chrisgatguis · 26-07-2007, 01:46 PM

Im sure this will have been touched upon before on the forum, i posted a thread last week about CEE and what to take it with (hot water) and also just been reading Liams thread about monohydrate when is best to take it etc.

Jist is that in my thread people (miller25 for example) obviously doesnt rate CEE, compared with in Liams thread CEE seems to be what people use.

Recently me and a few of my mates have been talking about supps in general (and basically BB in general) - we have agreed that basically there are just so many contradicting pieces of evidence around which completely discredit each other.

Its kind of frustrating to read one post backed up by extensive testing results etc to say that CEE is 'better' than mono and then another day the exact reverse...

Theres always two sides to any argument but just wondered really if generally in terms of supps/training/fat loss/recommendations everyone else is constantly trying to see through the bull sh*t and still strugling to work out how valid something is.

Rant over i'm just wondering wether i should be ditching my bulk powder CEE and invest in mono instead.

Conserned slightly with health issues (again that i have read about) i have never really taken my CEE for a considerably long time, therefore i cant really look at it and say 'it has been working for me, therefore ill keep on using it' as i've never really consistantly used it.

Anyones thoughts on this would be appreciated.

26-07-2007, 01:46 PM	#1 (permalink)
chrisgatguis Gym Addict Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: middlesbrough Posts: 172	Creatine: CEE vs MONO which is better Im sure this will have been touched upon before on the forum, i posted a thread last week about CEE and what to take it with (hot water) and also just been reading Liams thread about monohydrate when is best to take it etc. Jist is that in my thread people (miller25 for example) obviously doesnt rate CEE, compared with in Liams thread CEE seems to be what people use. Recently me and a few of my mates have been talking about supps in general (and basically BB in general) - we have agreed that basically there are just so many contradicting pieces of evidence around which completely discredit each other. Its kind of frustrating to read one post backed up by extensive testing results etc to say that CEE is 'better' than mono and then another day the exact reverse... Theres always two sides to any argument but just wondered really if generally in terms of supps/training/fat loss/recommendations everyone else is constantly trying to see through the bull sht and still* strugling to work out how valid something is. Rant over i'm just wondering wether i should be ditching my bulk powder CEE and invest in mono instead. Conserned slightly with health issues (again that i have read about) i have never really taken my CEE for a considerably long time, therefore i cant really look at it and say 'it has been working for me, therefore ill keep on using it' as i've never really consistantly used it. Anyones thoughts on this would be appreciated.