UK-Muscle Body Building Community - Bodybuilding Forum - View Single Post

Nine Pack · 18-12-2006, 06:29 PM

I'd just use them up & switch to CNP if I were you, but everyone has thier preference. Maximuscle & Muscletech are very well packaged & cleverly marketed, as for the quality................. I'll take the fifth on that one.

I'd use Pro Peptide & Pro Mass. to replace the Cell Tech, I'd use CNP's Creatine E2.

Like I say, this is my opinion, formed after over 15 years of trial & error with every make under the sun. There are a lot of the worlds top bodybuilders sponsored by other companies who use CNP themselves, but can't say so publicly due to contractual obligations. I have no contractual arrangements or obligation to recommend CNP, I just have a genuine belief in the quality of the stuff. Judging by the volume of the stuff that my clients buy & the other PT's clients who also buy it through me, I'd say the proof is in the pudding.

18-12-2006, 06:29 PM	#7 (permalink)
Nine Pack Shouldn't be let out loose.... Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Manchester Posts: 1,709	Re: Cell Tech Vs Cyclone? I'd just use them up & switch to CNP if I were you, but everyone has thier preference. Maximuscle & Muscletech are very well packaged & cleverly marketed, as for the quality................. I'll take the fifth on that one. I'd use Pro Peptide & Pro Mass. to replace the Cell Tech, I'd use CNP's Creatine E2. Like I say, this is my opinion, formed after over 15 years of trial & error with every make under the sun. There are a lot of the worlds top bodybuilders sponsored by other companies who use CNP themselves, but can't say so publicly due to contractual obligations. I have no contractual arrangements or obligation to recommend CNP, I just have a genuine belief in the quality of the stuff. Judging by the volume of the stuff that my clients buy & the other PT's clients who also buy it through me, I'd say the proof is in the pudding.